Tagged: election Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • 23:36 on 2009/10/20 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: election   

    Blogging this municipal election is so much more intense than 2005: I’ve just reread my entries from that autumn to recall the mood. It’s hard to even remember that Mayor Tremblay was running then against Pierre Bourque, who was trying to get his old job back. But a few of the stories hint at troubles to come.

    Early August 2005: Tremblay advisor Richard Théorêt bailed on the mayor’s party (then commonly known as UCIM) and went to work for Pierre Bourque, citing poor ethics and a lack of transparency. We were worried about where Karla Homolka was living, and MSO musicians were on strike. August 29, Tremblay launched his campaign with a few barbs at Bourque.

    I posted on September 1, 2005:

    This fall, the city’s going to try out a system of electronic voting as we vote for reps in the newly slimmed down post-merger city. It’s supposed to take a minute and a half to vote this way. Call me a pessimist, but I’m writing that down now, and we’ll see what actually happens on November 6.

    This year, ballots will be counted by hand, by human beings.

    Mid-September, Tremblay unveiled the Montreal 2025 plan, with a website which is still being updated, and went on to promise bread-and-butter items like a cleaner city and better roads. Bourque promised improvements and flowers and no new taxes. On September 22 I noted a La Presse piece about the city selling subsidized housing to a promoter, but the story link is dead. Late September, Tremblay’s election placards were investigated by the OLF for containing the word “Go”.

    September 23: the official campaign opened. September 30, I made my first note of the existence of Projet Montréal.

    October 2005 opened with a story about businessmen who made contributions to Tremblay’s party being rewarded with contracts. Bourque responded with a promise to form an ethics committee. A week later, though, water fluoridation briefly became the big issue. Meantime, the plan to bring the Casino to the Peel Basin was still alive, and people living nearby were protesting hard against the project.

    Mid-October, the Gazette was grumbling that the campaign lacked drama. Urban crud and potholes were the topics du jour. Clearly nobody was going to say “I like potholes and trash, let’s have more of them!” Tremblay promised more trees and cleaner water.

    Mid campaign, municipal affairs minister Nathalie Normandeau changed the rules for the agglomeration council to give the mayor of Montreal the balance of power, then she backtracked hastily.

    October 28, Tremblay got pied, apparently by blue-collar workers.

    The first part of the Gomery Report on federal corruption was tabled November 1, which might partly account for the lack of public interest in the municipal elections held November 6. The Mirror noted that the campaign was a snoozer compared to the big messy merged-city vote of 2001.

    November 6, Gérald Tremblay was re-elected as mayor with only 35% of the electorate casting votes. Tremblay received 53% of the votes to Bourque’s 36%. Pierre Bourque called for recounts, based on multiple failures by the electronic voting machines, but the vote was not close enough for the idea to have any traction.
    This blog was originally begun not long after the 2001 election, so I can’t chase its history down in the same way. I had a bad disk crash in March 2006, so none of the entries from before then are accessible to readers.

     
  • 21:45 on 2009/10/20 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: election   

    More details as beans continue to spill about Benoit Labonté’s technique for funding his party. (Have the media delved into their photo banks since last Friday to find ever glummer and less photogenic images of M. Labonté?) Also there’s evidence Louise Harel knew about Labonté’s activities but planned to sack him after the election, which is in some ways even weirder. I like Beaudet’s cartoon about Halloween decorations at City Hall.
    What with all the election drama, this blog could be a full-time job right now. Also, reviewing my posts from the 2005 municipal election, I’m amused to note that benoitlabonte.org still forwards to visionmtl.com.

     
  • 09:07 on 2009/10/20 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: election   

    Benoit Labonté’s withdrawal from the election is made official on the Election Montreal site; it was anonymous sources that brought Labonté down via the hand of ruefrontenac’s Fabrice de Pierrebourg, although Louise Harel suspects someone in the Tremblay camp; de Pierrebourg himself reports on one part of the sources story and rejects the implication he was dancing to a Union Montreal tune; last night’s debate snubbed issues of city planning and got right down to ethical issues – probably inevitable after the weekend’s drama; the wider issue of the infiltration of the Mafia into the construction industry (not a recent phenomenon, it seems to me) is being hushed up by towns colluding in a conspiracy of silence on the issue; another accusation piles up against Labonté, connected with grant money for a protégé of his; the city’s auditor general is now inquiring into the city’s telephone contract; some background on the big construction firms in the midst of the storm.

     
  • 09:01 on 2009/10/19 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: election   

    Novel ways for candidates to do public relations among electors have included going for walks with groups to hear about issues with traffic.

    The city has produced the elector’s manual in thirteen languages.

    Mayor Tremblay picked a choice moment to unveil his platform yesterday, while all eyes were on the Labonté debacle. A poll done last week had Tremblay and Harel neck and neck – but that was before the weekend’s drama.

    A look back at Benoit Labonté’s career and his tendency to turn allies into enemies; Michèle Ouimet ponders how leaders manage not to know what their right-hand man is doing – with a brief but telling sting about the lack of political experience of Louise Harel’s new wing man, Pierre Lampron.

     
  • 20:21 on 2009/10/18 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: election   

    A solid survey of where we are with transit promises, and what each of the major parties has in mind.

     
  • 19:07 on 2009/10/18 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: election   

    Louise Harel forced Benoit Labonté out of Vision Montreal today, or so it’s being framed.

    I asked back in June how long it would be till the political honeymoon ended: divorce after 4½ months. Mayor Tremblay is doing the gentlemanly thing and refusing to dance on Labonté’s political grave.

     
  • 11:46 on 2009/10/18 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: election   

    Benoit Labonté is to announce today that he’s leaving Vision Montreal altogether. It’s too late for the party to name a replacement candidate in Ville-Marie, and there’s nothing yet about whether Labonté will stay in the race as an independent, or drop out altogether.

     
  • 11:38 on 2009/10/18 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: election   

    It’s a bit rambling, but this Spacing piece by Émile Thomas essentially asks whether the absence of election placards is damaging municipal democracy. I’ve been surprised myself at how much I’ve missed the visual riot of placards: we’ll have to see from the turnout whether this was a sensible move or not.

     
  • 19:48 on 2009/10/17 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: election   

    TVA shows that Benoit Labonté had a number of brief chats with Tony Accurso and more than one meeting with him.

     
  • 14:00 on 2009/10/17 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: election   

    Squeezed by multiplying charges of having drunk the Accurso kool-aid, Benoit Labonté announces he won’t hold Louise Harel to the promise of making him executive committee chairman, should she be elected mayor. He’s also quitting as official head of opposition. So far, he’s still running as a Vision councillor in Ville-Marie.

     
  • 12:05 on 2009/10/17 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: election   

    Interesting interview with Alan DeSousa on the city’s approach to sustainable development; a look at André Lavallée and his opposition in Rosemont.

     
  • 11:35 on 2009/10/17 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: election   

    Yves Boisvert observes with a cynical eye the persistence of corruption in our municipal governments; Le Devoir presents a crisp summary of recent accusations against Benoit Labonté and allegations of the interesting manner in which he is said to have funded his unchallenged rise to the top of Vision Montreal in March 2008.

    Since the Journal de Montréal lockout I haven’t linked to any story on that site, but for once I’ll break my rule today and also point to their account of the hot water that M. Labonté finds himself in.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel