More on moving “Man”
Antoine Robitaille summarizes the arguments for and against moving the Calder “Man” in from its original setting, but doesn’t take a side, instead simply saying the city has to get more serious about public art.
-
Reply
-
Pages
Meta
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
Blogroll
- … an endless banquet
- archives de montréal
- c'est toi ma ville
- code rouge
- coolopolis
- expo lounge
- fagstein
- flat broke mtl
- history of canada by montreal metro
- images montréal
- julien cayer
- le mur mitoyen
- les beautés de montréal
- midnight poutine
- montréal multiple
- montréalités urbaines
- mtlurb forums
- pat white
- patrimoine, histoire et multimédia
- pieuvre
- quebec french guide
- radical montreal
- rover arts
- silo magazine
- spacing montreal
- taylor noakes
- the main
- turcot
- un taxi la nuit
- urbanphoto
- vanishing montreal
- walking turcot yards
-
carswell 13:17 on 2013/01/28 Permalink
Among the points Robitaille doesn’t address, one stands out. As mentioned on this blog a week or two ago, the city wants to make Parc Jean-Drapeau a bigger tourist draw. How can removing a major work of art from the park contribute to that goal?
Kate 19:43 on 2013/01/28 Permalink
Maybe some people don’t regard Man as “fun” enough?