Updates from August, 2012 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • 21:52 on 2012/08/21 Permalink | Reply  

    Pauline Marois would ban non-French-speakers from running for office at any political level. (Will native French speakers also have to pass a French exam? What happens if some rustic candidate for mayor of a small town flunks out?)

    Also Tuesday, a longtime Liberal party organizer suddenly stepped up for the CAQ.

     
    • Dhomas 05:12 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      Watching the debate Monday night, I was struck by Marois’ hypocrisy. She claimed “how will the mayor of a city represent his constituents to the rest of Quebec if he cannot speak French?” (paraphrasing here).

      Mme Marois: you want to be Premier of Quebec? How will you represent your constituents to the rest of Canada with your poor level of English?

    • Ian 05:53 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      That’s a very good observation, Dhomas, that hadn’t occurred to me before – a Premier’s job is, to some extent, to work with other Premiers and lobby on behalf of the province overseas.

    • ant6n 05:54 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      How will she just represent the whole province of Quebec?

    • Jack 06:29 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      The PQ if elected will ban Cree and Inuit from running their school boards and municipal councils, on the basis of this language qualification. You think Richler sullied the name of Quebec worldwide, wait till the international media get hold of this, Quebec will be compared to…………

    • Bert 06:31 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      I can’t believe I am actually defending Marois… Her English is not bad, it’s just that she is not confident about it, for whatever (IMHO unjustified) reason. She makes a big deal about speaking in English, refusing English debates, pre-clearing english language interviews, etc. She makes a show of it for no reason, like a toddler throwing a hissy fit.

      It may be that she lacks personal confidence, it may be that she doesn’t want to expose herself to to any possible criticism.

    • Jack 07:36 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      @ Bert the reason she doesn’t debate in english, is more in tune with what Mathieu Bock-Cote said,” Quebec has one official language, why should she debate in english”, it would gain no votes and hurt her with her base.What is interesting is her generation, Louise Beaudoin,Louise Harel, etc. not speaking english was a badge of honour, that thankfully is not shared by the newer generation of French origin quebecers. One other thing not shared is the de-colonization language that Marois uses so frequently in French, liberte, empancipation,etc.,it sounds so old even Loco Locass can’t make it hip.

    • Bill Binns 08:46 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      @Jack The de-colonization stuff is hilarious. When I first read some of those comments, I thought it was just a weird translation thing. I wonder if the rank and file PQ imagine their ancestors hunting mastadons across the Canadian shield as the glaciers receded.

      It makes me think of the Christian Fundamentalist museums in the US that show Jesus riding a saddled dinosaur.

    • Bert 08:59 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      According to a CBC article “Parti Québécois leader Pauline Marois has declined to take part in an on-air English debate, claiming her English is not strong enough.” Global reports “Marois cited her language ability as an issue, saying that she is not comfortable enough to conduct such an important discussion only in English. ” That certainly does not sound like a “I only have to speak French.” to me.

      By completely ignoring the Englsh, which is fine for me, she just further alienates potential votes.This just allows her a version of “…. money and the ethnic vote…”, which she has placed her party in.

      Why does she not do what she has proposed that civil servants do, just answer in French when you think the people involved understand French? Because she would look arrogant and elitist.

    • jeather 09:36 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      “It’s like saying the Inuit were here first so you all have to speak Inuktitut.”

      What I wouldn’t give.

      “Without [the ability to speak French], a person could not be a candidate in elections, participate in the public financing of political parties or petition the legislature to address grievances.”

      That sounds more extreme than other articles, which suggest that you need Quebec citizenship to run for office (etc), but that everyone who was born here automatically received such citizenship. (Which I also disagree with.)

      Would this work for federal MPs?

    • Jean Naimard 09:37 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      SPEAK WHITE!

      How come those who are appaled at Pauline’s command of english do not say anything about those other provincial prime ministers who cannot utter a word of français?

      The canadian double-standard at work again!

      If it’s good for the goose, it can’t be for the gander!

      I read the comments here, and I feel I gone back 50 years in time.

    • Ian 10:07 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      According to Graham Fraser, Canada’s Commissioner of Official Languages, six of Canada’s premiers are bilingual… without the legal obligation to be. That’s the talking point here, the legal obligation part.

    • Taylor C. Noakes 11:48 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      @JeanNaimard

      The only threatened cultures and peoples in Québec are the First Nations.

      They should use all the same rhetoric and tactics of the PQ to further their cause.

      At least they’d be justified.

    • Anto 13:13 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

    • Jean Naimard 13:29 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      As it happens, the natives are the least threatened in Québec, because law 101 also protects native languages, and native children are schooled in their native language from the onset.

    • Kevin 13:55 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      @Jean Naimard
      The premiers of Ontario, Manitoba, New Brunswick should be required to speak passable French.
      Given the number of Quebecers who head west, it’d be a good idea for Alberta too.

      In BC it makes more sense to speak Cantonese/Mandarin/Urdu.

      But then again, I have no problems with Pauline’s command of French. She speaks it quite well.

    • Chris 16:50 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      Is this PQ proposal meant to solve some actual problem? Has the electorate been electing representatives that they can’t communicate with? Seems unlikely.

  • 13:17 on 2012/08/21 Permalink | Reply  

    Where in town would I see the widest selection of current event posters? Looking for club nights and shows rather than stage events, but anything really.

     
    • Fawksfyre 14:37 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      If you simply want a list of upcoming live shows (concerts), I’d drop by Cheap Thrills, they print out all the bands coming into town right next to their cash registers.

      Or go to a venue, they always have posters put up inside or outside. Le National, La Tulipe, Club Soda, Metropolis, L’Olympia, etc.

    • AJ 14:45 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      If not specialist record stores (if those still exist), culture-y places like cafés (Laika has a wall of posters just through its windows); hair salons and clubby boutiques. Other than that, Facebook and MySpace, because most people do e-flyers / e-vites / event pages nowadays. Done a few myself in the day.

    • AH 17:01 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      electrical poles on saint-viateur are usually good for artsy indie show posters (although probably not the widest range of genres). I associate club nights more with flyers than posters, but what do i know.

    • steph 17:28 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      http://cultmontreal.com/events/ & http://justshows.com/montreal/ . Or did you actually want physical printed posters?

    • Kate 19:29 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      Actual printed posters to look at. I’m a graphic designer in my real life.

      AH: yes, flyers are more usual, but I have a poster to make.

    • Ian 22:41 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      Seripop or casa del popolo have lots of physical samples you can browse through. I’d pst the online link but somehow my post gets lost. google montrealnightlife – your spam filter seems to cut me out.

  • 08:52 on 2012/08/21 Permalink | Reply  

    The public service union is fighting changes at the Biosphere but the city sounds lukewarm; Vision Montreal is on the side of saving the ‘sphere as an educational facility. “Environment Canada would not make any government officials available for interview Monday” says the Gazette – of course not.

     
    • cheese 09:44 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      I propose that we turn this awesome example of a bucky ball into a Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome type gladiator arena and prison for people convicted of gross crimes against the environment. Harper would be the ideal first prisoner. The trials could be there to, it will be our version of the Hague. Who could we make harper fight for the main event on opening night?

      PS: sorry of this is a re-post my original did not appear on the page.

    • walkerp 11:23 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      I like your thinking Cheese!

    • Bill Binns 12:36 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      4 words – Worlds biggest Orange Julep!

  • 07:43 on 2012/08/21 Permalink | Reply  

    CBC shows us how not to do an infographic with a display of STM stats in big letters that doesn’t add to our understanding.

    (Properly speaking, an infographic takes advantage of visuals to create a compelling picture from the numbers – it doesn’t just arrange the numbers in a pretty way with little drawings.)

     
    • Matt 07:54 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      Thought the same thing. Anyone care to do a proper one?

    • Marc 08:30 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      It’s much too busy.

    • Kate 20:40 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      Here are some recent infographics in an award shortlist, just for fun.

  • 07:29 on 2012/08/21 Permalink | Reply  

    Latest stats show that the early summer student strife didn’t frighten the tourists away.

     
    • Michel 08:01 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      I’m sure at least one of your commenters is going to disagree.

    • Kate 08:19 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      Yes, I’m expecting it.

    • Ephraim 09:32 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      August was great, actually.

    • jeather 11:18 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      I suppose you could argue that there would have been even more tourists had we not had the student strike. Or you could argue that the student strike brought Montreal to the news and essentially advertised for it as a tourist destination.

    • Kate 20:41 on 2012/08/21 Permalink

      Yes, on the principle that all publicity is good publicity.

    • Ephraim 16:02 on 2012/08/22 Permalink

      BTW, July wasn’t as good as August (but I do admit that August was great, I think numbers surpassed last year and less discounting). And it’s interesting because August is usually full of Europeans, so the American tourists filled a gap. September at the moment, isn’t looking that great, especially the start of it. Down from last year in reservations. But you can never tell, the Americans tend not to reserve too far ahead, unlike the Europeans.

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel