Updates from April, 2012 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • 22:50 on 2012/04/14 Permalink | Reply  

    CTV says Projet Montréal is being blamed for the slump in business on Prince Arthur’s resto strip. Projet councillor Alex Norris ripostes in the comments.

    We’ve already discussed Prince Arthur here. Norris does suggest the formula of a strip with nothing but restaurants for blocks is not working, but he has to be tactful about the outmoded format of a lot of those establishments. We identified additional reasons for the street’s decline in that thread, which I invite Mr. Norris, if he reads this blog, to have a look at.

     
    • Charles 23:16 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      How to they explain then that Duluth, which is also in the same district, is doing so well? Duluth has much more interesting and varied restaurants.

    • Robert J 23:17 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      I’d like to think every city councillor reads this blog religiously.

    • Kate 23:50 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      Is Duluth thriving? I used to live close by but don’t go along there very often any more. There used to be quite a different more varied vibe on the street east of Saint-Denis, and of course now that’s where the Pied de Cochon has made such a splash.

      Robert J: So would I, but I doubt it!

    • Robert J 23:54 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      I lived at the corner of St-Dominique and Duluth for a few years. Back then I would say it was a healthy street. There’s a couple of laundromats, a Portuguese grocery store, several quality deps, as well as a decent mix of restaurants (not all of which are great but several good spots in all price ranges, from Chez José to Pied de Cochon). I’d say it’s about the perfect example of a highly functional street in the Plateau.

    • Chris 01:12 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      Norris’s reply there is spot on. Duluth is doing well, there are no empty buildings.

    • Jack 05:11 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      The one thing I am very happy about is the instant response by Projet Montreal and Mr.Norris, since they are now blamed for the weather,stock prices and gray hair. Having the temerity to question car usage in North America will make you some pretty big enemies so I appreciate the new media strategy.

    • Antonio 06:18 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      I live in La-Petite-Patrie and work downtown. I often walk home rather than take the metro when it’s nice and end up on either Duluth or Prince-Arthur depending upon the route that I choose to take.

      Duluth seems to be doing well on either side of St-Denis. Prince-Arthur between Laval Avenue and St. Lawrence Boulevard currently looks like a commercial disaster area, with the Gourmet Grec being a burnt-out shell and three or four other restaurants closed down. That said, one or two of these restaurants had “opening soon” signage in their windows. I hope that the street recovers.

    • Paul S. 11:27 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      There should be a requirement for city councillors to have a grasp of basic business. The Projet Montreal clearly does not understand the needs of those small shopkeepers who keep the area alive and it’s no surprise, as none of those elected have a business background. I don’t expect armchair media pundits to sympathize with their plight but elected officials should. I was in the restaurant business and I’m so glad that I didn’t have to deal with those pontificating a***oles from the PM.

    • Kate 12:04 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      Paul S. (“paul@noneofyourbusiness.com”? Have the courage of your convictions), our planet’s being chipped away at piece by piece for “business” reasons. A major reason Projet is supported by many people is their willingness to entertain the idea that sometimes you have to draw the line against what “business” wants.

    • Chris 12:05 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      Paul, requiring that of councillors would be extremely undemocratic. Shall we also require them to have a grasp of basic engineering, basic carpentry, basic dendrology? No. In any case, they have professionals in the bureaucracy to consult with on relevant topics.

    • Chris 12:08 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      Also, am I the only one that finds it weird that merchants on one of the city’s only pedestrian-only streets are complaining about parking availabilities & policies ? Their street is something very unique, which they should be able to turn into an advantage.

    • Alex Norris 15:22 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      Thanks Kate. Something I forgot to mention elsewhere is that the nearest parking meters to this strip (on Saint-Laurent betweeen Sherbrooke and Pine) have been at $3 an hour for many years. And the price of those meters has not changed since we took office. So cross that reason off the list of reasons why we are supposedly to blame for Prince Arthur’s decline. As for snowclearing, Prince Arthur is basically a seasonal street; it’s been a dead zone in the winter for many years and virtually all of its business gets done in the spring, summer and fall — so here again, it’s hard to blame Projet Montréal for what ails this street. Taxes? As I pointed out in my CTV post, those are determined by the central city admin, not the borough — and we in fact decided NOT to impose a borough tax (unlike half the boroughs in the city). So there’s yet another reason to cross off the list of why we are supposedly to blame for the woes of Prince Arthur. Lack of parking? We have not eliminated a single parking space in the vicinity of that strip of Prince Arthur St. So that complaint is off the list too. In fact, there goes the whole premise of the story. Yes, Prince Arthur is facing a lot of challenges. High taxes (set by the central city), high rents (set by local commercial landlords), a highly seasonal business (which has been the case since the strip got started) and businesses which have not all succeeded in keeping up with the times and appealing to a broad enough market, plus a nasty fire that has left a burnt-out wreck in the middle of the strip. The comparitive success of restaurants on Duluth and Gilford (between St-Denis and Rivard) and Mont-Royal Avenue (whose bistros and restaurants are booming) is proof that the real source of the problem does not lie with borough policies. That said, we’ll do what we can to work with the merchants to help revitalize this strip and make it more appealing to a broader market. Also, please keep in mind that because of the seasonal nature of this particular strip of restaurants, it almost always looks bad at this time of year. Give it another month or two and it will look a lot better. I know that at least three new establishments are set to open soon on that strip.

    • Kate 15:42 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      Thank you for dropping by, Alex. That’s a very solid defense.

    • Alex Norris 15:45 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      PS: @Paul S., you’re wrong to state that none of us has a background in business. Plateau borough mayor Luc Ferrandez is a management consultant who has run his own business and has worked in management and as a consultant for a number of large companies. And we DO sympathize with the plight of some of these business owners; that’s one reason that, despite 9-per-cent cuts in funding to our borough by the Tremblay admin since we were elected, we chose NOT to impose our own borough tax: we recognize that many small businesses have already been hit hard by tax hikes imposed by the central city and therefore decided not to worsen matters by imposing an additional tax ourselves. As for “pontificating,” I’m sorry that’s how you see it; I call it “being held accountable.” It would be easier not to respond to questions on blogs and in social media but I consider it part of my job to do so.

    • Arthur 16:07 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      Projet Montreal should have left the parking issue alone, it hurt a lot of the businesses up there.

    • ant6n 18:56 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      Maybe this is some sort of campaign to reduce rents and/or tax evaluations?

    • Kate 22:14 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      Campaign on whose part, ant6n?

    • ant6n 00:08 on 2012/04/16 Permalink

      business owners … people trying to set up shop for cheap? But nah, that wouldn’t happen.

      On the other hand, Prince Arthur’s been in the news a lot lately. And since it seems to be easy these days to get into the news if you blame Projet Montreal for something, seems like a cheap way to get publicity.

  • 22:32 on 2012/04/14 Permalink | Reply  

    La Presse has a whole dossier on the Titanic with a clever infographic embedding a link to a PDF version of the paper’s edition of 100 years ago. Very nice.

     
  • 20:47 on 2012/04/14 Permalink | Reply  

    There always comes a time when I realize how many browser tabs I’ve got piled up here, and have to either post about something or blow the tabs away…

    Quel Avenir’s François Cardinal posted Friday about a book that has a section on how Montreal’s identity comes from its two languages and the admirable progress anglos have made in adopting French. Comments are a bit depressing, though. Also, Don Macpherson pens a bitter screed in the Gazette about pretty much the same thing – the progress of the Quebec anglo.

     
    • Robert J 23:20 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

    • Antonio 06:41 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      Robert J: that’s a nice feel-good piece but I can’t say that I agree with everything the author puts forward. For one, I consider myself to be a fluent speaker of “international” French but with a Quebec accent, which naturally reflects the place where I was born and raised. I don’t say “je m’en va,” I say “je m’en vais” and I don’t think that makes me any less of a speaker of “Quebec” French because I don’t deliberately choose to use incorrect grammar. And even though I employ correct grammar, people who hear me speak know unequivocally that I am a local.

      Regarding Anglos sending kids to French school, I wouldn’t do it, lest their kids be deemed Francos according to the Charter of the French Language and lose the right to choose the language of their own kids’ instruction. Sending your kids to French school is also currently an effective way to ensure that they get sub-standard English lessons, to put it mildly.

    • Kevin 09:17 on 2012/04/16 Permalink

      The quality of English even at the famed IB schools is pathetic, to put it mildly, according to two friends of mine. I’m talking pre-school readers ‘See Spot Run’ in grade 3. :/

  • 20:37 on 2012/04/14 Permalink | Reply  

    The city has decided that all terrasses have to be universally accessible within 5 years – curious, city hall following a Projet initiative from the Plateau.

     
    • Adam 21:29 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      I wonder how many terrasses are going to be lost because the establishment can’t afford to make the renovations.

    • Kate 21:31 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      Some may be lost, but if they’re not accessible to everyone perhaps they shouldn’t be there at all.

    • Robert J 23:40 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      I agree Kate, but we could probably dispose of a number of borough/city rules about terrasses that make accessibility more difficult (Mont-Royal terrasses have to have built up barriers for example, other streets/events require raised platforms at sidewalk level). I guess my point is the city should build/organize the streets so that they can accommodate terrasses (and their inhabitants), not vice versa.

      On a side note, I don’t think we need to close down streets to car traffic to have great terasses and street life. I think if we rebuild commercial streets like Ste-Catherine and Mont-Royal more like Duluth (i.e. a more discreet demarcation between sidewalk and streets), drivers would just be a lot more attentive to pedestrians, and much more proximity between cars and people on foot could be tolerable.

    • Chris 01:34 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      I think the Plateau is only the 2nd or 3rd borough to mandate this.

    • Adam 08:32 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      “Some may be lost, but if they’re not accessible to everyone perhaps they shouldn’t be there at all.”

      Isn’t that like arguing that unless everyone can afford to eat at a restaurant, no one should eat there?

    • Kate 08:48 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      Well yes, Adam, I’m happy to see you beginning to understand basic socialism at last.

    • Ian 11:07 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      I understand that bars and restaurants should be accessible to improve the quality of life of all residents (and maximise their profits) , but not all bars and restaurants have the physical real estate to rejig their accessibility – one example I can think of offhand is L’Autre Bar on Laurier, the only bar on the mile-end section of Laurier with a real terrasse. The only way they could make a wheelchair ramp would be to create a double ramp across the narrow frontage, losing at least 3 terrasse tables. I don’t see why existing establishments can’t be grandfathered in. FWIW

      I spend a fair bit of time on bar terrasses, many of which are sidewalk level so accessible by wheelchair, and in all my years of bar-going I have seen one or two people in a wheelchairs on a bar terrasse. I have seen more “little people” in bars, in all seriousness. Shall we mandate lower bartop counters, too, to accommodate them?

      You want to really improve business in the area, though, in all seriousness, let’s mandate co-ordinated construction so Louisbourg will stop digging up the same intersections over and over again (on the taxpayer dime) – right now they’re digging up Labadie and Parc, for literally the 4th time since construction began. I wonder how many more times they will need to dig it up, refill it, and pave it before they are done.

    • Kate 22:15 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      I have seen one or two people in a wheelchairs on a bar terrasse

      Yes, I’ve thought that too, but this is not about what people actually do but what they perceive themselves as being barred from doing.

    • Chris 23:21 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      It’s also a chicken and egg problem.

    • Ian 07:57 on 2012/04/16 Permalink

      Not really – like I said, there are lots of sidewalk level and ramped terrasses around – lots on saint-Denis, for instance (but not all). I could see if there was a big wheelchair-bound clientelle agitating for more access but as it stands I haven’t seen much action in the already accessible places that, by chicken & egg logic, should be jammed with wheelchair users wishing to expand their terrasse usage.

    • Matt H 12:39 on 2012/04/16 Permalink

      You also need to consider the accessibility of washrooms, which is generally terrible in Montreal e.g. often down/up a flight of stairs or ridiculously tiny. A bar might have a great accessible terrasse, but many people with disabilities might not even bother with it if they know that they can’t use the washroom.

  • 19:07 on 2012/04/14 Permalink | Reply  

    Thousands marched peacefully downtown Saturday afternoon for a Quebec spring.

     
  • 10:21 on 2012/04/14 Permalink | Reply  

    Globe and Mail Toronto Star ponders Montreal’s casino as Toronto debates opening one itself.

     
    • Josh 14:45 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      Sure looks like that link goes to the Toronto Star, not the Globe.

    • Kate 16:19 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      Bof. You’re right.

  • 10:08 on 2012/04/14 Permalink | Reply  

    Another big protest is planned for Saturday, with unions and community groups expected in addition to student groups for a march being called a Printemps Québécois. The demo starts at Jeanne-Mance Park at 13h and walks down to Victoria Square. Saturday is the 9th anniversary of the election of the Charest government.

    The view from Ontario in the Globe & Mail – already I’ve seen several articles in different places claiming that student solidarity is failing, but that seems to be wishful thinking for the moment.

     
    • Joey 10:48 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      “The view from Ontario”? Aren’t the writers (and the principals quoted in the piece) Quebecers?

    • Kate 10:53 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      The writing is published from Toronto.

    • Robert J 20:39 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      More like the view “for” Ontario.

  • 09:49 on 2012/04/14 Permalink | Reply  

    Velo-Quebec is not too pleased about the planned sale of Bixi to foreign interests. But Quebec is pushing for the sale because it would wipe out Bixi’s debt with the city.

     
    • qatzelok 11:12 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      No wonder. We have billions for new car bridges and interchanges, but nothing for university education or cycling promotion. Charest is a total Maurice Duplessis.

    • Snowpea 13:08 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      While wiping out the Bixi debt would be great, it feels shortsighted on the provincial government’s part to sell out what may very well be a Quebec success story IF it were given the time to bloom.

    • Robert J 13:46 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      While a big fan and bixi client I don’t think it’s reasonable for BIXI to turn a profit. The hype around this particular model of cycle share will probably die down in a few years and won’t pay for the system in the long term. It’s totally normal that what is essentially a public transit option not make a profit, but we may never have the opportunity to get rid of the debt one shot like this if international sales drop.

      So maybe better safe than sorry.

    • mdblog 13:54 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      Robert J, Nothing wrong with Public Transit not turning a profit, but BIXI is can hardly be considered public transit. Public transit should first and foremost be accessible to the great majority of people – including the old, infirm, and those otherwise handicapped or disabled.

    • Robert J 14:01 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      Well, think of BIXI as taking a few agile bums out of the bus system and making room for the old an infirm, etc. I don’t see any problem with calling it public transit. You can also think of it as a contribution to public health by encouraging cycling as a means of transportation in the city.

      Either way, it’s a public service, not just a flashy toy. I several hundred dollars last year by not getting STM passes and relying solely on BIXI.

    • Joey 10:50 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      The element of Bixi that serves Montrealers as public transit should not be profit-driven. But there’s no reason why Bixi, developed by local entrepreneurs/designers/etc. and staked by the citizens of Montreal, should not provide returns to the city from its international export business.

    • Kate 15:49 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      Returns, or a one-time payment? Given the growing popularity of the system, being forced to sell it off now feels like killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.

    • qatzelok 17:52 on 2012/04/15 Permalink

      The symbolism of selling BIXI International is humiliating as well: “We don’t invent things, we just vacuum resources out of the ground and give them to smart people to make things with.” But business is always crass, and never romantic or beautiful, so maybe that’s the lesson here.

  • 09:41 on 2012/04/14 Permalink | Reply  

    This weekend is Orthodox Easter, and the Outremont parish caught in the borough’s squabble with the Hasidic community is going to hold its procession after all, just not walking in the street as they usually do. Note that the procession is a key part of their service and not an optional festivity.

     
    • William 10:45 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      I’m actually surprised that anyone could consider the “temporary” Outremont parade ban to be constitutional.

    • Ian 13:51 on 2012/04/14 Permalink

      I’m surprised that anyone honours it; anyone enforcing this ban would be the target of international condemnation.

  • 09:25 on 2012/04/14 Permalink | Reply  

    Butch Bouchard has died. He was captain of the Canadiens from 1948 till 1956 and won four Stanley Cups with them. They clearly don’t make ‘em like that any more. Bouchard was 92.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel