Updates from December, 2011 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • 23:21 on 2011/12/20 Permalink | Reply  

    Lots of snow is being manufactured for the snow village to open January 6 on Île Sainte-Hélène whether we get any natural snow or not.

     
  • 21:10 on 2011/12/20 Permalink | Reply  

    Five people were arrested today in connection with the murder of Salvatore Montagna, whose body was found a few weeks ago in a river in Charlemagne. One of the guys rounded up is Raynald Desjardins, who himself narrowly escaped an assassination attempt this fall. Lovely people.

     
  • 20:46 on 2011/12/20 Permalink | Reply  

    Two city buses collided Tuesday afternoon and 14-15 people were injured, none seriously.

     
  • 20:21 on 2011/12/20 Permalink | Reply  

    The project to turn the old Viger station into a posh hotel plus a 17-storey office building has been revived and the city is keen. I wish it were possible to revive the use of the existing building without adding the office tower.

     
    • qatzelok 22:48 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      Adding a 17-story component to this unique piece of architecture might be wonderful news if the new part imitates and disappears into the station. The Chateau Frontenac that we know today was created this way.

    • Robert J 08:22 on 2011/12/22 Permalink

      Nah lets build a modern part that complements the building instead. The Chateau Frontenac is a yucky neo-Disney cardboard castle with a nostalgic and sentimental idea of architecture.

  • 20:12 on 2011/12/20 Permalink | Reply  

    Richard Bergeron wants to see 37.5 km of tramway built here for 2017. The city has struck a work group to figure out financing for a tramway so maybe Bergeron is not dreaming in colour.

    The map shown in Metro is tiny. Projet’s paper on the idea is here in PDF form – page 12 has the map.

     
    • Jack 21:30 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      I love the colour of his dreams.

    • Robert J 08:29 on 2011/12/22 Permalink

      This is so much smarter and polished than the tramway map that Projet came up with a few years ago (in which virtually every major artery had a tramway). I think they’ve picked all the most important areas for tramway development (especially Mt-Royal/Masson– a big hole in the metro map). They should bring the Mt-Royal trams directly downtown to relieve orange/green line congestion. I just got back from Rome, where mass transit congestion is cataclysmic, in large part because tramways are extensions of the metro and do not substitute it in the central areas.

  • 13:44 on 2011/12/20 Permalink | Reply  

    A recent poll shows that Montreal’s attractions are not well known to world tourists although some point out the Olympic stadium as a feature, which is giving the tourism ministry hope for more money to “improve” the surrounding area. Olympic park management is also hoping to get a new roof onto the stadium by 2016.

    Montreal is like many B-list towns, in that it’s not one or two big shiny or historic things that stand out here, but the general quality of life and visual texture of our streets that’s attractive. Unfortunately, bureaucracy has no idea how to extend or re-create that – and I’m not the first to wonder why.

    We love the Plateau and Mile End and older streets like Wellington, Masson and Mont-Royal, but modern redevelopments – check out newly rebuilt areas like the new housing built behind Rosemont metro on the old city yards site, or the Faubourg Quebec stuff east of Old Montreal – are usually built of 100% residential complexes. You probably have not gone to look at those areas, because nobody has any reason to be there unless they live there. New Griffintown is likely to be the same. No reason for tourists to walk through these streets. People talk wistfully about re-creating a Plateau vibe, but build new condos right to the sidewalk edge without anything for passersby at street level – and wonder why these neighbourhoods become moribund dormitories full of strangers.

    A traditional neighbourhood is a live thing. You see your neighbours in the streets, run into them at the store or the corner café, and people gradually build a web of friends and acquaintances (exes and enemies, too – let’s not get too sentimental). Human beings have been doing this since the first urban settlements were built. But now, when a building is a stack of pods from which you descend to the garage and drive away to do your shopping and eating at some random distant point, there is no life where you live.

    This city badly needs to tweak and enforce better zoning to avoid the worst of this, but can they see the need to rebuild parts of the city in a better way? Montreal does not have the Eiffel Tower or Piccadilly Circus and our major known landmark is a stadium we don’t use any more. What we have to offer is the life in our streets – which is to say daily life, and not a corporately sponsored month of festivals every summer – and we need to recognize what creates it and learn how to foster and extend it, or we won’t have anything at all.

     
    • paul 14:09 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      Bravo!

    • Marc 15:36 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      Hampstead was a very early version of this. Not even a dep. in that town.

    • qatzelok 15:50 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      I’m very familiar with Angus Shops. I actually met one of the developers’ sons, and he stressed how green the construction techniques were.

      That’s nice. You still have to drive everywhere, and the car volume and lack of pedestrians make this “lovely brick sculpture” just a big, dead maze of lookalike walls.

    • Bill Binns 15:55 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      We are a city on an island and we are about to build a new bridge. There is no reason why the new bridge could not be our Eiffel Tower or more appropriately, our Golden Gate Bridge. I wonder what the price difference would be between another ugly anonymous highway bridge and something that will immediately become an icon and a symbol of Montreal that will bring tourists here for generations?

      Enough with the Olympic Stadium already. Most of the native Montrealers I know support tearing the thing down. Why in the world would a tourist want to leave downtown to go look at an empty stadium squatting in the middle of a square mile of concrete? The neighborhood is a wasteland of Dollorama’s and Tim Horton’s in identical strip malls.

      I think Montreal’s best angle for tourism is playing up it’s quasi-European image. Sidewalk cafes, great restaurants, world class museums etc. A walking city full of interesting architecture. Keep the tourists downtown and in old Montreal where they are comfortable and safe and where there is ample opportunity for them to spend their money.

      We also need to do something about our horrible third world taxi system and find a convenient way to get tourists from downtown to the the lookout on Mount Royal.

    • Beeper 16:48 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      Great post!

    • Antonio 20:31 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      I disagree with your negative take on the development behind Rosemont Metro, formerly the site of municipal workshops and yards used to repair the City’s fleet of vehicles. The Quartier 54 development is mixed residential/commercial with a specialty grocer already set up as a tenant. Plus, the Borough is undertaking the refurbishment of the brown-brick art deco building at 700 Rosemont Blvd and turning it into the Marc Favreau library and community centre. There will also be a park developed behind the future library. I think it has a lot of potential to be far more than a “moribund dormitory” as you say. Plus, the influx of more affluent residents is already starting to have positive effects on nearby Plaza Saint-Hubert.

    • Doobious 20:32 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      Nice rant. You should vent more often. It’s pretty amusing.

      But to put things in perspective, just visit the suburbs. Every single one of the problems you mentioned, an order of magnitude more severe, for miles and miles on end. Compared to that hell, a condo in Griffintown would be pretty sweet, even if the streets are deserted and the nearest cafe is a 10 minute walk away.

    • Chris 22:09 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      So many of our problems are due to car culture. And it shows no sign of abating. :(

    • Kate 23:30 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      OK Antonio, I will have another look at the Rosemont metro development soon and post about it. I admit to mostly having peeked in from outside and seen only condos. I was aware of the art deco building they kept facing Rosemont, but they seem to be taking their time over fixing it up.

    • TC 23:54 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      This post hit on what I love about Montreal. It isn’t just the older areas along the river, in fact what I really enjoy visting are St. Denis, the Main, the Plateau. There is a great vibe in the town, the French and English language mix is unique. Overall, I sense things are a lot more relaxed than in other North American cities.

      @Bill Binns: Boston, where I live, built a new bridge, the Zakim, that has become one of the emblems of the city. It is actually the widest, although not at all the longest, suspension bridge in the world.

    • Bill Binns 07:32 on 2011/12/21 Permalink

      @TC – The Zakim is a great example. Even though you cannot walk over it, it can be seen from all over the city and is a beautiful gateway into Boston from the north. It’s certainly a lot more attractive than the bridge it replaced!

    • ant6n 19:05 on 2011/12/21 Permalink

      The stadium is one of the main attractions of the city. You can’t just tear and down and construct another symbol somewhere else, just cuz the surrounding area is not so nice – it makes much more sense to just make the area around the stadium nicer.

    • Antonio 21:30 on 2011/12/21 Permalink

      Kate, the delays in refurbishing the art deco building are due to a budgetary squabble between Rosemont-Petite-Patrie and the City. A borough councilor told me that the parties have settled their differences, a design has been chosen as has a prime contractor and the thing should be finished by spring 2013.

    • Robert H 23:39 on 2011/12/21 Permalink

      Doobius, je suis d’accord généralement avec ton opinion à l’égard des banlieue (surtout si c’est Laval/Mississauga) mais ce que Kate a ecrit n’est pas un “rant” plutôt qu’un analyse réfléchi de l’attrait de Montréal. C’est vrai que notre ville n’est pas une déstination touristique à l’échelle de Londres, Paris, New York, ou Los Angeles (“B-list town”–Kate, personne ne peut vous accuser de voir tout en rose). Cependent, elle a bien expliqué le charme subtil de la métropole du Québec: il s’agit de l’ambience et l’atmosphère des quartiers caratéristiques. TC de Boston disait presque la même chose. N’oublions que pour les résidents de Boston et de New York, les deux vedettes aux palmarès touristiques, Montréal est une déstination préférée. C’est pourquoi je suis sceptique quant aux grands projets visée à attirer les touristes à la recherche de la prochaine nouveauté. Le but primaire devrait être l’amélioration de la ville pour ceux qui y habitent. Ça fait, les visiteurs viendront. Par example, Bill Binns a raison que le remplacement du pont Champlain est une occasion qui vaut les dépenses nécessaires pour qu’on fasse quelque chose de spécial comme le pont Zakim à Boston (mais bien sûr plus haut et plus long). Un tel projet d’infrastructure bien fait pourrait rapporter les retombées au-delà d’un autre féstival ou événement.

      Merci ant6n: on devrait pas démolir le stade olympique; ce n’est pas trop tard d’en faire bon usage…faudrait qu’on le croit.

      Marc: Hampstead comme Ville Mont Royal sont les cousines de English Garden Suburbs…ville dortoirs classiques.

      qatzelok: Les Angus Shops, pas mal mais on aurait pu faire de mieux. Les rues pourquoi sont-elles si larges. On n’a pas besoin de tout ce béton.

    • Kate 14:19 on 2011/12/22 Permalink

      Antonio: thanks for the info. I’m glad they’re keeping that building and fixing it up.

      Robert H: être “B list” n’est pas une insulte. Montréal est une bonne ville pour vivre, mais ne soyons pas naïfs, nous ne sommes pas dans la même ligue que Paris, Londres, New York ou Tokyo.

  • 13:17 on 2011/12/20 Permalink | Reply  

    The Palais des congrès is smartening itself up for a major tech conference in October.

     
    • Doobious 21:59 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      That whole corner of town is a bit too touristy for me, but if you’re down there and find yourself with a few minutes to spare, check out the art galleries therein the Palais. Some really beautiful pieces are on display there, and it costs nothing to check them out.

    • Kate 14:19 on 2011/12/22 Permalink

      The Palais had a great public bathroom at the west end, but last time I tried to use it, it was locked. Feh. This city is way too short of public conveniences.

    • Doobious 23:29 on 2011/12/27 Permalink

      Interesting-looking book spotted in the architecture section at Chapters tonight: Public Toilet Design by Cristina del Valle Schuster.

      And one of my favourite bits of public art: The sign hanging off the ceiling of the south end of the PVM food court, directing patrons toward the subterranean parking garage. One sexy-ass profile of a sedan featured there. I’d steal the thing if I thought I could get away with it.

  • 13:01 on 2011/12/20 Permalink | Reply  

    Stadium Porn has a feature on the new Stade Saputo remade for the MLS team that will take the field this season.

     
    • Clément 13:56 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      I’m actually amazed that there’s a web site / blog that focuses on stadiums.
      I’m also curious as to how you came to discover this blog? Please don’t say you already subscribed to the RSS feed…

    • Josh 14:56 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      @Clément: I think you’d be surprised at what’s out there, especially for baseball stadiums.
      http://www.worldstadiums.com/
      http://www.stadiumguide.com/
      http://www.ballparks.com/

      And they can get WAY more specific than that. Here’s a site that focuses exclusively on the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League: http://www.qmjhlarenaguide.com/

      If you like a sport, chances are there is a website dedicated to the arenas or stadiums of the leagues you watch.

    • Kate 15:17 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      I read ‘em all, Clément!

  • 11:55 on 2011/12/20 Permalink | Reply  

    Quebec has topped up funds for Montreal’s poor by $9.5 million, and I’d really love a breakdown of where that money goes – mostly into office rents and salaries for fonctionnaires, probably. Which are needed, but $9.5M doesn’t go very far in those terms.

     
  • 11:52 on 2011/12/20 Permalink | Reply  

    A big shipment of cocaine was nabbed at the port at the end of November, hidden in bottles of sunflower seed oil. I’m not a user, but I have to admit my first thought was “There goes a lot of folks’ festive cheer.”

     
    • Robert J 08:35 on 2011/12/22 Permalink

      Lol, whenever I read these kind of stories I mentally count how many people I personally know who may be directly or indirectly affected.

  • 03:24 on 2011/12/20 Permalink | Reply  

    The federal transport minister has the idea of naming the new “Champlain” bridge the pont Maurice-Richard.

     
    • qatzelok 04:13 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      By the time it’s built, it will be the Telus Bridge.

    • Bert 07:20 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      Not that I would mind another thing named after Maurice Richard, but the Autoroute 50 is already named in his honour.

    • Kate 11:01 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      It also makes me wonder: so would we have to find something else major to name after Champlain?

    • Steve Quilliam 11:43 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      I don’t really agree that a bridge should be name after Maurice Richard. As much as i admire the hockey player, he was, after all, a hockey player. An arena, a place in the city, monuments, a street or boulevard, ok, but a bridge. Maurice Richard is part of Quebec and more importantly of Montreal but Montreal is not only about Maurice Richard so i wouldn’t like to go over board on that. It’s a lot for one hockay player.

      Of course i won’t loose sleep about it and won’t make a big fuss but the name Champlain should remain, IMO. But i think it is a way for the federal conservative to appeal to nationalist quebeckers.

    • Kate 13:05 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      I think maybe someone realized that the very names “Champlain Bridge” and “Pont Champlain” now have overtones of fail, so they’d prefer to give the new one a fresh name. The sad thing about Maurice Richard is that, while he’s always a nice memory in Montreal, the name is also a reminder of how far back we have to go to find real hockey glory.

    • Beeper 16:49 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      Richard didn’t even go to the war. The fact that he’s considered such a hero is beyond me.

    • Kate 19:07 on 2011/12/20 Permalink

      Richard was turned down three times for military service. He had already bashed up his ankles and wrists badly enough playing minor-league hockey that they wouldn’t take him for a soldier. There may be issues with considering him a hero, but the war service thing isn’t one of them.

  • 03:00 on 2011/12/20 Permalink | Reply  

    City director-general Louis Roquet has quit the job with three years left in his contract.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel